This post is for our Paid Subscribers. If you haven’t subscribed yet,
.
.
.
.
Clarifying Questions
Before sketching a design, I want to pin down exactly what “for kids” means here, since Netflix already has a kids profile feature and the interesting design work is in what to fix or add, not building from a blank page.
Are we redesigning the existing Kids Profile experience inside the main Netflix app, or proposing a standalone Netflix Junior app? These have very different engineering and business implications. I will design an improved in-app Kids Profile experience first, with a standalone app as the long-term vision, since Netflix’s actual product history shows them iterating inside the core app rather than spinning off separate apps.
What age range are we optimizing for, given that “kids” spans a 2-year-old and a 12-year-old with completely different needs? I will design primarily for the 2 to 9 age range, where parental control and content curation matter most, and treat 10 to 12 year olds as a lighter-touch adjacent segment.
Should the design account for Netflix’s 2022 ad-supported tier and 2023 password-sharing crackdown, both of which affect how families actually use the service? I will assume kid profiles remain ad-light regardless of plan tier, since parent trust would collapse quickly if children were served the same ad load as adult profiles, and I will assume the design works within a single-household paid plan.
Is education or learning value in scope, or is this purely an entertainment engagement problem? I will include a light educational layer, since parents increasingly expect some developmental value from screen time, but I will not turn Netflix into an edtech product; entertainment stays the core job.
For this answer I will assume the goal is to modernize Netflix’s existing Kids Profile into something genuinely engaging and trustworthy for both the child watching and the parent paying, not a full rebuild of Netflix’s content strategy.
Product Description
Netflix was founded in 1997 as a DVD-by-mail rental service and pivoted to streaming in 2007, a decision that eventually reshaped the entire media industry. As of 2024 Netflix has approximately 270 to 300 million paid memberships across more than 190 countries, generating roughly 33.7 billion dollars in revenue in 2023. Netflix introduced a dedicated Kids Profile in 2013, a PIN-protected, simplified interface that restricts content to age-appropriate maturity ratings and hides the search bar’s free-text access to the full catalog. The kids and family library today includes licensed hits like Bluey and CoComelon alongside Netflix originals such as Ada Twist, Scientist and Karma’s World, plus a smaller but growing library of interactive “choose your own path” specials in the vein of the 2019 title Puss in Book.
The strategic tension Netflix is navigating is real. The company launched an ad-supported tier in November 2022 and enforced a password-sharing crackdown through 2023, both of which changed how families actually access and pay for the service. Meanwhile, Netflix Kids competes for a young viewer’s attention against YouTube Kids, which has enormous scale and an algorithmically generated content firehose, Disney+, which has unmatched IP depth for kids, and PBS Kids, which leads on trusted educational content. Netflix’s kids experience today is functionally safe but not particularly engaging: it is essentially a filtered, smaller version of the adult app, with the same tile-based browsing interface and no meaningful interaction layer beyond playing a video.
Define Goal
The core problem is that Netflix Kids solves the safety problem, restricting content by maturity rating, reasonably well, but does not solve the engagement problem, giving kids a genuinely fun, self-directed way to find and enjoy content, or the trust problem, giving parents real visibility and control over what their child is actually watching and for how long.
The goal I want to focus on is making the Kids Profile a self-contained, joyful experience that a child under 9 can navigate almost entirely on their own, while giving parents enough visibility and control that they trust it more than YouTube Kids. Every design decision should be evaluated against both halves of that goal simultaneously, since a feature that delights kids but worries parents will get the profile locked down, and a feature that reassures parents but bores kids will get abandoned for a competitor’s app.
North Star Metric: Weekly Healthy-Session Kid Profiles, defined as the percentage of kid profiles opened at least 3 times in a 7-day window with an average session length between 20 and 45 minutes. I chose this range deliberately: fewer than 3 sessions a week suggests the profile is not sticky, while sessions well above 45 minutes on a regular basis are more likely to trigger parental concern about excessive screen time than to reflect healthy engagement. This metric forces the team to optimize for sustainable delight, not raw watch-time maximization.
User Segmentation
Kids (the direct users)
Preschoolers (2 to 5): Pre-readers, need icon and voice-driven navigation, gravitate toward repeat-watching of familiar characters, short attention span per session but very high frequency.
Early Elementary (6 to 9): Can read simple text, start forming favorite-show identities, want a sense of choice and progress, badges and unlocks, and watch longer sessions while starting to explore beyond parent-picked shows.
Tweens (10 to 12): Often push to leave the Kids Profile entirely for the main app, want content that does not feel babyish, lower priority for this redesign but worth a lighter, less restrictive profile tier.
Parents (the gatekeepers and payers)
Screen-Time-Anxious Parents: Actively worry about how much and what their child watches, want visibility, limits, and reassurance, and will switch services if they lose trust.
Convenience-First Parents: Want the profile to reliably occupy their child for a set period, during a work call or a commute, care most about reliability and safety, less about educational value.
Co-Viewing Parents: Regularly watch with their child, want shared recommendations and the ability to bridge from a kids show into a family-appropriate title everyone enjoys together.
I would focus this redesign on Early Elementary kids, 6 to 9, and Screen-Time-Anxious parents, because that pairing has the clearest unmet need: kids old enough to want agency and progress, and parents anxious enough that better visibility and limits would materially increase their trust and retention.
