How would you decide if an AI feature is Ready for Launch?
AI Product Management Interview Question: How would you decide if an AI feature is Ready for Launch?
Dear readers,
Thank you for being part of our growing community. Here’s what’s new this today,
AI Product Management Interview Question -
How would you decide if an AI feature is Ready for Launch?
Note: This post is for our Paid Subscribers, If you haven’t subscribed yet,
Clarify the Scope of the Question:
The most common failure in AI launches is not technical weakness but ambiguity. Teams say a feature is ready because the model looks good in demos. That is not a launch criterion. “Ready” must be explicitly defined in business, user, and risk terms before any evaluation begins.
A. Clarify the launch scope
First, determine what kind of launch this is:
Internal dogfood
Limited beta
Gradual public rollout
General availability
The definition of ready changes by scope. For example, a beta launch may tolerate higher error rates but requires strong feedback instrumentation. A GA launch demands higher reliability, clearer documentation, and stronger safety guardrails.
B. Define the user job and success metric
AI features often fail because teams optimize model metrics instead of user outcomes.
Start by defining:
What user problem is being solved
What measurable outcome signals success
For example:
If the AI is a coding copilot, readiness may be measured by task completion time reduction or acceptance rate of suggestions.
If it is a support chatbot, resolution rate and containment rate matter more than raw model accuracy.
If it is a RAG-based knowledge assistant, grounded answer rate and citation correctness are critical.
Tie readiness to 3 to 5 explicit target metrics such as:
Human-rated usefulness above a defined threshold
Reduction in manual workload
Engagement increase
Cost per successful task
Support ticket reduction
Without predefined thresholds, readiness becomes subjective.
C. Define risk tolerance and acceptable failure modes
All AI systems make mistakes. The question is whether those mistakes are acceptable for the domain.
A creative writing assistant has high tolerance for stylistic variance.
A financial advisory tool or medical assistant has near zero tolerance for factual hallucinations.
Before launch, define:
Maximum acceptable hallucination rate
Maximum acceptable critical error rate
Safety incident tolerance
Escalation paths
This aligns engineering, product, legal, and compliance around the same bar.
Model and Output Quality Readiness
AI systems are probabilistic and non-deterministic. That means quality must be evaluated systematically and repeatedly using both automated and human methods.
